News Nation Logo

Judge Loya case: Timeline and all about the judicial proceedings

The Top Court Said That There Was No Merit In The Petitions, Adding That There Was No Reason To Doubt The Statements Of The Sitting Judges.

News Nation Bureau | Edited By : Gautam Lalotra | Updated on: 19 Apr 2018, 01:49:17 PM
Judge B H Loya

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a batch of pleas seeking an independent probe into the alleged mysterious death of special CBI judge B H Loya, who was hearing the high-profile Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case. 

The top court delivered the verdict, saying there was no merit in the petitions and there was no reason to doubt the statements of the sitting judges. 

The court further observed that Judge Loya died a natural death, and said that the petitioners attempted to malign the image of the judiciary.
Judge Loya, who was hearing the sensitive Sohrabuddin Sheikh "fake encounter" case, had allegedly died of a cardiac arrest in Nagpur on December 1, 2014.

On November 30, 2014, Brijgopal Harkishan Loya went from Mumbai to Nagpur for the wedding of a fellow judge's daughter. On the morning of December 1, his family was told he had died of a heart attack.

Judge Loya's death came under the scanner in November 2017 after media reports quoting his sister had fuelled suspicion about the reason behind his death and its link to the Sohrabuddin case. However, Loya's son had on 14 January 2018 said that his father had died of natural causes. BJP chief Amit Shah was an accused in the case but had been discharged.

Timeline of Judge Loya case

#Dec 1, 2014: Judge Loya dies of cardiac arrest in Nagpur, where he had gone to attend the wedding of a colleague’s daughter.

#Nov 2017: The issue comes under spotlight after media reports quote his sister fuelling suspicion about the circumstances surrounding Loya’s death and its link to the Sohrabuddin case.

#Jan 11, 2018: SC agrees to hear two pleas seeking an independent probe into Loya’s death.

#Jan 12: SC terms “serious matter” the alleged mysterious death of Loya, seeks a response from Maharashtra government.

#Jan 16: SC says Maharashtra government can decide which documents relating to the death of Loya could be handed over to the petitioners.

#Jan 22: Terming “serious” the issues raised in the pleas on the death of Loya, SC transfers to itself two petitions related to Loya’s death from Bombay High Court.

#Jan. 31: Former Navy chief Admiral (retd.) L. Ramdas moves SC seeking an independent inquiry into the matter by a panel of retired apex court judges and former police officers.

#Feb. 2: SC says it was concerned only with the death of Loya and would not go into other aspects including BJP chief Amit Shah’s discharge in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case.

#Feb. 5: A Mumbai lawyers’ body decides to petition SC, seeking cross-examination of 11 people, including two judges, in connection with Loya’s death.

#Feb. 9: Maharashtra government opposes pleas seeking an independent probe into the matter, terming them “motivated” and based on “yellow journalism”.

#Feb. 12: Maharashtra government tells SC the statements of four judges, who were with Loya on the last day of his life and had termed his death “natural”, were “unimpeachable”.

#Feb. 19: SC says it was treating Loya’s case with utmost seriousness and for a cause. The same day senior advocates for petitioners say pressure being exerted on them to leave the case.

#Mar. 5: SC says change of roster in Bombay HC a routine affair, adds questions should not be raised over the change in the judge hearing the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case in the HC.

#Mar. 8: SC takes umbrage over an accusation by a senior lawyer for casting aspersions on judges that they were only asking “searching questions” to those who brought the Loya death case before it, and not to the Maharashtra government.

#Mar. 9: Maharashtra government comes down heavily on alleged accusations, bullying, and browbeating of judges in the SC by some activist lawyers in the Loya death case and said the judiciary and judicial officers need to be saved from such averments.

#Mar. 9: Centre for Public Interest Litigation, an intervenor NGO in the case, says Loya may have died due to poisoning as he had complained of chest congestion.

#Mar. 12: A Mumbai-based lawyers’ body brings on record in SC an order of the Bombay HC to allege that one of the two judges, who had given the statement in the Loya death case, had ordered settlement of a criminal case against a top BJP leader in 2014.

#Mar. 16: SC reserves verdict on pleas for a probe into Loya’s death

#April 19, 2018: SC dismisses pleas seeking an independent probe into the case, saying attempts were made to scandalise and malign the judiciary by leveling serious allegations against judicial officers and judges of Bombay HC.

For all the Latest India News, Download News Nation Android and iOS Mobile Apps.

First Published : 19 Apr 2018, 01:40:17 PM