News Nation Logo

Office of profit case against 21 AAP MLAs: Election Commission rejects plea, to continue hearing

In A Major Jolt To The AAP, The Election Commission Has Ruled That It Will Continue Hearing A Plea Against The Party’s Nearly Two Dozen MLAs For Allegedly Holding Office Of Profit, Despite The Delhi High Court Setting Aside Their Appointment As Parliamentary Secretaries.

PTI | Updated on: 24 Jun 2017, 02:36:21 PM
Office of profit case against 21 AAP MLAs: EC rejects plea, to continue hearing

New Delhi:

In a major jolt to the AAP, the Election Commission has ruled that it will continue hearing a plea against the party’s nearly two dozen MLAs for allegedly holding the office of profit, despite the Delhi High Court setting aside their appointment as parliamentary secretaries.

The office of profit petition was filed against 21 AAP MLA. Later, proceedings were dropped against Jarnail Singh after he resigned as the Rajouri Garden MLA to contest Assembly polls in Punjab.

The EC order stated that the Commission was of the “considered opinion” that the AAP MLAs did hold “de facto the office of parliamentary secretaries from March 13, 2015 to September 8, 2016”.

The order comes days before Chief Election Commissioner Nasim Zaidi demits office in July.

Election Commissioner O P Rawat, who recused himself from the case after Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had questioned his impartiality, has not signed on the order.

Read | Office of profit case: EC reserves order on plea of 21 AAP MLAs

The petitioner, Prashant Patel, maintained that the high court order should have no bearing on the case being heard by the EC as the MLAs were enjoying the fruits of that office till their appointment was set aside by the high court.

On September 8, the high court had set aside the appointment of the 21 AAP MLAs as parliamentary secretaries.  The court had said the order to appoint them as parliamentary secretaries was given without the concurrence of the Lieutenant Governor.

A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal had set aside the March 13, 2015 government order after the counsel appearing for the Delhi government “conceded” that it was issued without taking concurrence or views of the LG.

The poll panel had heard the case on December 16 last before it got busy with Assembly elections in five states.

On March 27, the commission had reserved its order on the issue.

For all the Latest India News, Download News Nation Android and iOS Mobile Apps.

First Published : 24 Jun 2017, 02:26:00 PM