News Nation Logo


President rule in Arunachal Pradesh comes under SC scrutiny

The Imposition Of President’s Rule In Crisis-hit Arunachal Pradesh Today Came Under The Scanner Of The Supreme Court Which Sought The Report Of Governor Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa Recommending Central Rule In The State, Saying “it Is Too Serious A Matter'.

PTI | Updated on: 27 Jan 2016, 06:06:54 PM

New Delhi :

The imposition of President’s rule in crisis-hit Arunachal Pradesh today came under the scanner of the Supreme Court which sought the report of Governor Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa recommending central rule in the state, saying “it is too serious a matter”.

The remark by a five-judge bench headed by Justice J S Khehar came when Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi raised a preliminary objection contending that the notification on promulgation of President’s rule has not been challenged in the fresh plea.

The bench asked the Attorney General not to raise “technical objections” when he persisted with his plea arguing that “rules are rules” and they apply equally to all.

It posted the matter for February one asking the Governor and the Ministry of Home Affairs to file responses by Friday on petitions filed by Congress leaders including the plea of Rajesh Tacho, Chief Whip of Congress Legislature party in the state assembly which is now kept under suspended animation.

The bench allowed the petitioners to amend their plea by Friday.

When Additional Solicitor General Satpal Jain, appearing for the Governor, sought to maintain secrecy of the report and the recommendation for the President’s rule, the bench said, “He will only mention the date of report recommending President’s rule to opposite parties during the course of the day.”

However, the bench for its own perusal sought in a sealed cover the report and recommendation on imposition of the President’s rule.

“Unless we get the grounds for recommending the President’s rule, we cannot proceed. If grounds are not same in the proclamation then it is totally a different ball game,” the bench, also comprising justices Dipak Misra, M B Lokur, P C Ghose and N V Ramana, said during the hearing.

The bench was also of the view that no interim order can be obtained unless the parties see the grounds for proclamation for President’s rule.

A battery of senior lawyers including Fali S Nariman, Kapil Sibal, Rajeev Dhawan and Vivek Tankha opposed the plea of governor seeking to maintain secrecy of his report and recommendation, saying that larger bench of more than five judges have alreadey laid down the proposition on this aspect.

For all the Latest India News, Download News Nation Android and iOS Mobile Apps.

First Published : 27 Jan 2016, 07:55:00 AM