For the first time in over two decades, member states of the Arctic Council failed to agree on a final declaration at their bi-annual ministerial meeting on Tuesday, due to a US refusal to mention climate change. At the start of the 11th gathering of Arctic foreign ministers, in the Lapland town of Rovaniemi, Finnish Foreign Minister Timo Soini announced a change to the planned agenda, saying the final joint declaration would be replaced by ministerial statements.
Several sources said it was because member states were unable to reach an agreement, with the United States alone refusing to mention climate change in the final text.
“I don’t name and blame anybody,” Soini, who chaired the meeting, told reporters.
“But of course, it is clear that climate issues are different from the different viewpoints and the different capitals,” he said.
In place of the traditional declaration, the council released a shorter “ministerial statement”, which set out future goals for the organisation but conspicuously made no mention of climate change.
But Soini also took the unusual step of releasing much of the rejected declaration—complete with climate goals—as a “chair’s statement”.
“The hang up here right now is America making it hard to make a final agreement,” Sally Swetzof of the Aleut International Association, one of six organisations representing indigenous peoples, told AFP.
The Arctic Council groups Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, and the United States, and their cooperation is usually frictionless.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo assured his Arctic counterparts that “the Trump administration shares your deep commitment to environmental stewardship.”
He insisted America was “doing our part” in protecting the climate, and said the US has reduced emissions of black carbon more than any other Arctic Council member state.
The US has repeatedly pointed to Russia’s failure to submit information about its own emissions as a reason why environmental targets do not work.
“Collective goals, even when well intentioned, are not always the answer,” Pompeo told the meeting.
“They are rendered meaningless, even counterproductive, as soon as one nation fails to comply,” he said.
In a speech on the eve of the meeting, Pompeo instead pledged to strengthen the US’s Arctic presence to keep in check the “aggressive attitude” of China and Russia in the resource-rich region.
On Tuesday China’s foreign ministry hit back at Pompeo’s remarks, calling them “a misrepresentation of the facts that has ulterior motives”.
The Secretary of State’s speech also drew strong criticism from some pressure groups.
“America’s Arctic ambivalence is a far greater threat than the ambitions of Russia and China combined,” Victoria Herrmann of the Arctic Institute said in a statement.