Cricket Australia's 'arrogant', 'controlling' culture led to ball-tampering scandal in Cape Town, reveals review

A review into a ball-tampering scandal has condemned an "arrogant" and "controlling" culture at Cricket Australia that led to players cheating in pursuit of victory.    

The independent review by the Sydney-based Ethics Centre accused Cricket Australia (CA) of only paying lip service to the spirit of the game, leaving players without any moral guidance. 

Read More | Ayodhya Land Dispute: Hindus losing their patience on the Ram temple issue, says Giriraj Singh

"Responsibility for that larger picture lies with CA and not just the players held directly responsible for the appalling incident at Newlands," said the review, which was released on Monday.   

The scandal involved Australian players using sandpaper to alter the flight of the ball in a Test match against South Africa last March at Cape Town's Newlands Stadium.  

Read More | LIVE | Rahul Gandhi in MP: Congress chief says farm loans will be waived off within 10 days of polls

Coach Darren Lehmann quit in the wake of the controversy and then-captain Steve Smith, deputy David Warner and batsman Cameron Bancroft were banned from the game.   

However, the Australian Cricket Association has called for the cheating bans of Warner, Smith and Bancroft to be slashed because they were put under too much pressure by administrators.

The players' union painted the three Test stars as victims of circumstance and said they should be free to take the field again at the top level after the inquiry slammed Cricket Australia's handling of the case.

The scandal also claimed the scalps of CA chief executive James Sutherland and team performance boss Pat Howard. The review, which was partially redacted to prevent individuals being identified, included complaints from those involved in the sport that there was a bullying culture in elite men's cricket.   

"The broad consensus amongst stakeholders is that CA does not consistently 'live' its values and principles," it said.   "CA is perceived to say one thing and do another. The most common description of CA is as 'arrogant' and 'controlling'."   

It said under such circumstances, the ball-tampering scandal was foreseeable but CA failed to act. CA chairman David Peever said the review provided an opportunity for the body to "look in the mirror".   

"It has been a difficult and confronting time for everyone involved in Australian cricket, and for that I am sorry," he said.   "Mistakes have been made, lessons have been learnt, and changes are and will continue to take place."   

Peever indicated he would not be joining the exodus from CA and said the 12-month bans on Smith and Warner and a nine-month ban on Bancroft would stand.