Italy wants to reward fertile families with state land

Italy’s populist government plans to reward parents who have a third child by awarding them a piece of land, in a bid to reverse the country’s plummeting birth rate, media reported on Wednesday.

The plan, cooked up by the far-right League and included in the draft budget for next year, would see the state concede parcels of agricultural land for 20 years to parents who have a third child between 2019 and 2021.

“They say that Italians have few children and that something is needed to turn the trend around,” said Agriculture Minister Gian Marco Centinaio.

Also Read | Statue of Unity - a befitting tribute to Sardar Patel, Congress didn’t do anything for Patel, says his family members

“That’s why the ministry wants to contribute, favouring rural areas in particular, where people still have children,” he told the media.

Italy has the lowest birthrate in Europe. Last year some 464,000 births were registered, a record low, leaving Italy with a significantly older population and a demographic time bomb.

The land-for-children idea is supported by Italy’s ultra-Catholic families minister Lorenzo Fontana, who said however that it will be limited to married couples, rather than those in civil unions.

Political commentators said that would not be easy, as the law provides civil unions with most of the same rights as marriage.

Read More | Ban on Steve Smith, David Warner and Cameron Bancroft must be lifted: ACA

Foreigners interested in the offer would need to have been resident in Italy for at least 10 years.

According to Coldiretti, the association of Italian agricultural companies, the state owns half a million hectares (1.2 million acres) of farmland worth nearly 10 billion euros ($11.3 billion).

“Why give them away rather than sell them, particularly at a moment when all that money could go towards the government’s many (and costly) pledges?” asked the Corriere della Sera daily.

Because “for the most part, the lands are what is left at the bottom of the barrel,” it said, adding that in some cases local councils were currently having to shell out for their upkeep.